Btrfs: run orphan cleanup on default fs root
authorJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:30:53 +0000 (14:30 +0000)
committerChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:20:39 +0000 (16:20 -0500)
This patch revert's commit

6c090a11e1c403b727a6a8eff0b97d5fb9e95cb5

Since it introduces this problem where we can run orphan cleanup on a
volume that can have orphan entries re-added.  Instead of my original
fix, Yan Zheng pointed out that we can just revert my original fix and
then run the orphan cleanup in open_ctree after we look up the fs_root.
I have tested this with all the tests that gave me problems and this
patch fixes both problems.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
fs/btrfs/inode.c

index 009e3bd..87b2554 100644 (file)
@@ -1993,6 +1993,12 @@ struct btrfs_root *open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
        if (!fs_info->fs_root)
                goto fail_trans_kthread;
 
+       if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
+               down_read(&fs_info->cleanup_work_sem);
+               btrfs_orphan_cleanup(fs_info->fs_root);
+               up_read(&fs_info->cleanup_work_sem);
+       }
+
        return tree_root;
 
 fail_trans_kthread:
index 5606361..8cd1099 100644 (file)
@@ -3797,12 +3797,6 @@ struct inode *btrfs_lookup_dentry(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
 
        if (location.type == BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY) {
                inode = btrfs_iget(dir->i_sb, &location, root);
-               if (unlikely(root->clean_orphans) &&
-                   !(inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
-                       down_read(&root->fs_info->cleanup_work_sem);
-                       btrfs_orphan_cleanup(root);
-                       up_read(&root->fs_info->cleanup_work_sem);
-               }
                return inode;
        }