[PATCH] sem2mutex: vfs_rename_mutex
authorArjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:00:33 +0000 (03:00 -0800)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:38:12 +0000 (07:38 -0800)
Semaphore to mutex conversion.

The conversion was generated via scripts, and the result was validated
automatically via a script as well.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
fs/cifs/dir.c
fs/cifs/fcntl.c
fs/cifs/file.c
fs/cifs/inode.c
fs/cifs/link.c
fs/cifs/readdir.c
fs/cifs/xattr.c
fs/namei.c
fs/super.c
include/linux/fs.h

index fed55e3..632561d 100644 (file)
@@ -138,9 +138,9 @@ cifs_create(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *direntry, int mode,
        cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
        pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
 
-       down(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(direntry);
-       up(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        if(full_path == NULL) {
                FreeXid(xid);
                return -ENOMEM;
@@ -317,9 +317,9 @@ int cifs_mknod(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *direntry, int mode,
        cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
        pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
 
-       down(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(direntry);
-       up(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        if(full_path == NULL)
                rc = -ENOMEM;
        else if (pTcon->ses->capabilities & CAP_UNIX) {
index a7a47bb..ec4dfe9 100644 (file)
@@ -86,9 +86,9 @@ int cifs_dir_notify(struct file * file, unsigned long arg)
        cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(file->f_dentry->d_sb);
        pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
 
-       down(&file->f_dentry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&file->f_dentry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(file->f_dentry);
-       up(&file->f_dentry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&file->f_dentry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
 
        if(full_path == NULL) {
                rc = -ENOMEM;
index 675bd25..165d674 100644 (file)
@@ -203,9 +203,9 @@ int cifs_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
                }
        }
 
-       down(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(file->f_dentry);
-       up(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        if (full_path == NULL) {
                FreeXid(xid);
                return -ENOMEM;
index 5935991..ff93a9f 100644 (file)
@@ -574,9 +574,9 @@ int cifs_unlink(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *direntry)
 
        /* Unlink can be called from rename so we can not grab the sem here
           since we deadlock otherwise */
-/*     down(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);*/
+/*     mutex_lock(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);*/
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(direntry);
-/*     up(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);*/
+/*     mutex_unlock(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);*/
        if (full_path == NULL) {
                FreeXid(xid);
                return -ENOMEM;
@@ -718,9 +718,9 @@ int cifs_mkdir(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *direntry, int mode)
        cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
        pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
 
-       down(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(direntry);
-       up(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        if (full_path == NULL) {
                FreeXid(xid);
                return -ENOMEM;
@@ -803,9 +803,9 @@ int cifs_rmdir(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *direntry)
        cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
        pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
 
-       down(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(direntry);
-       up(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        if (full_path == NULL) {
                FreeXid(xid);
                return -ENOMEM;
@@ -1137,9 +1137,9 @@ int cifs_setattr(struct dentry *direntry, struct iattr *attrs)
                        rc = 0;
        }
                
-       down(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(direntry);
-       up(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        if (full_path == NULL) {
                FreeXid(xid);
                return -ENOMEM;
index 0f99aae..8d0da7c 100644 (file)
@@ -48,10 +48,10 @@ cifs_hardlink(struct dentry *old_file, struct inode *inode,
 /* No need to check for cross device links since server will do that
    BB note DFS case in future though (when we may have to check) */
 
-       down(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        fromName = build_path_from_dentry(old_file);
        toName = build_path_from_dentry(direntry);
-       up(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        if((fromName == NULL) || (toName == NULL)) {
                rc = -ENOMEM;
                goto cifs_hl_exit;
@@ -103,9 +103,9 @@ cifs_follow_link(struct dentry *direntry, struct nameidata *nd)
 
        xid = GetXid();
 
-       down(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(direntry);
-       up(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&direntry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
 
        if (!full_path)
                goto out_no_free;
@@ -164,9 +164,9 @@ cifs_symlink(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *direntry, const char *symname)
        cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
        pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
 
-       down(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(direntry);
-       up(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
 
        if(full_path == NULL) {
                FreeXid(xid);
@@ -232,9 +232,9 @@ cifs_readlink(struct dentry *direntry, char __user *pBuffer, int buflen)
 
 /* BB would it be safe against deadlock to grab this sem 
       even though rename itself grabs the sem and calls lookup? */
-/*       down(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);*/
+/*       mutex_lock(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);*/
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(direntry);
-/*       up(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);*/
+/*       mutex_unlock(&inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);*/
 
        if(full_path == NULL) {
                FreeXid(xid);
index 288cc04..edb3b6e 100644 (file)
@@ -404,9 +404,9 @@ static int initiate_cifs_search(const int xid, struct file *file)
        if(pTcon == NULL)
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       down(&file->f_dentry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&file->f_dentry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(file->f_dentry);
-       up(&file->f_dentry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&file->f_dentry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
 
        if(full_path == NULL) {
                return -ENOMEM;
index 777e336..3938444 100644 (file)
@@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ int cifs_removexattr(struct dentry * direntry, const char * ea_name)
        cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(sb);
        pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
                                                                                      
-       down(&sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(direntry);
-       up(&sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        if(full_path == NULL) {
                FreeXid(xid);
                return -ENOMEM;
@@ -116,9 +116,9 @@ int cifs_setxattr(struct dentry * direntry, const char * ea_name,
        cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(sb);
        pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
 
-       down(&sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(direntry);
-       up(&sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        if(full_path == NULL) {
                FreeXid(xid);
                return -ENOMEM;
@@ -223,9 +223,9 @@ ssize_t cifs_getxattr(struct dentry * direntry, const char * ea_name,
        cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(sb);
        pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
 
-       down(&sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(direntry);
-       up(&sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        if(full_path == NULL) {
                FreeXid(xid);
                return -ENOMEM;
@@ -341,9 +341,9 @@ ssize_t cifs_listxattr(struct dentry * direntry, char * data, size_t buf_size)
        cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(sb);
        pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
 
-       down(&sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        full_path = build_path_from_dentry(direntry);
-       up(&sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_unlock(&sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        if(full_path == NULL) {
                FreeXid(xid);
                return -ENOMEM;
index 8dc2b03..c72b940 100644 (file)
  */
 /*
  * [Sep 2001 AV] Single-semaphore locking scheme (kudos to David Holland)
- * implemented.  Let's see if raised priority of ->s_vfs_rename_sem gives
+ * implemented.  Let's see if raised priority of ->s_vfs_rename_mutex gives
  * any extra contention...
  */
 
@@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ struct dentry *lock_rename(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
                return NULL;
        }
 
-       down(&p1->d_inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+       mutex_lock(&p1->d_inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
 
        for (p = p1; p->d_parent != p; p = p->d_parent) {
                if (p->d_parent == p2) {
@@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ void unlock_rename(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
        mutex_unlock(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex);
        if (p1 != p2) {
                mutex_unlock(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex);
-               up(&p1->d_inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_sem);
+               mutex_unlock(&p1->d_inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
        }
 }
 
@@ -2277,17 +2277,17 @@ asmlinkage long sys_link(const char __user *oldname, const char __user *newname)
  *     a) we can get into loop creation. Check is done in is_subdir().
  *     b) race potential - two innocent renames can create a loop together.
  *        That's where 4.4 screws up. Current fix: serialization on
- *        sb->s_vfs_rename_sem. We might be more accurate, but that's another
+ *        sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex. We might be more accurate, but that's another
  *        story.
  *     c) we have to lock _three_ objects - parents and victim (if it exists).
  *        And that - after we got ->i_mutex on parents (until then we don't know
  *        whether the target exists).  Solution: try to be smart with locking
  *        order for inodes.  We rely on the fact that tree topology may change
- *        only under ->s_vfs_rename_sem _and_ that parent of the object we
+ *        only under ->s_vfs_rename_mutex _and_ that parent of the object we
  *        move will be locked.  Thus we can rank directories by the tree
  *        (ancestors first) and rank all non-directories after them.
  *        That works since everybody except rename does "lock parent, lookup,
- *        lock child" and rename is under ->s_vfs_rename_sem.
+ *        lock child" and rename is under ->s_vfs_rename_mutex.
  *        HOWEVER, it relies on the assumption that any object with ->lookup()
  *        has no more than 1 dentry.  If "hybrid" objects will ever appear,
  *        we'd better make sure that there's no link(2) for them.
index 9cc6545..425861c 100644 (file)
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(void)
                down_write(&s->s_umount);
                s->s_count = S_BIAS;
                atomic_set(&s->s_active, 1);
-               sema_init(&s->s_vfs_rename_sem,1);
+               mutex_init(&s->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
                mutex_init(&s->s_dquot.dqio_mutex);
                mutex_init(&s->s_dquot.dqonoff_mutex);
                init_rwsem(&s->s_dquot.dqptr_sem);
index 9ed1f36..0f71ee7 100644 (file)
@@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ struct super_block {
         * The next field is for VFS *only*. No filesystems have any business
         * even looking at it. You had been warned.
         */
-       struct semaphore s_vfs_rename_sem;      /* Kludge */
+       struct mutex s_vfs_rename_mutex;        /* Kludge */
 
        /* Granuality of c/m/atime in ns.
           Cannot be worse than a second */