decnet: Use data ready call back, rather than hand coding it
authorSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Fri, 8 May 2009 06:30:25 +0000 (06:30 +0000)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Sat, 9 May 2009 20:15:47 +0000 (13:15 -0700)
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net/decnet/dn_nsp_in.c

index 5d8a2a5..932408d 100644 (file)
@@ -578,6 +578,7 @@ out:
 static __inline__ int dn_queue_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int sig, struct sk_buff_head *queue)
 {
        int err;
+       int skb_len;
 
        /* Cast skb->rcvbuf to unsigned... It's pointless, but reduces
           number of warnings when compiling with -W --ANK
@@ -592,22 +593,12 @@ static __inline__ int dn_queue_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int sig
        if (err)
                goto out;
 
+       skb_len = skb->len;
        skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
        skb_queue_tail(queue, skb);
 
-       /* This code only runs from BH or BH protected context.
-        * Therefore the plain read_lock is ok here. -DaveM
-        */
-       read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
-       if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
-               struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
-               wake_up_interruptible(sk->sk_sleep);
-               if (sock && sock->fasync_list &&
-                   !test_bit(SOCK_ASYNC_WAITDATA, &sock->flags))
-                       __kill_fasync(sock->fasync_list, sig,
-                                   (sig == SIGURG) ? POLL_PRI : POLL_IN);
-       }
-       read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
+       if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
+               sk->sk_data_ready(sk, skb_len);
 out:
        return err;
 }