af_iucv: use sk functions to modify sk->sk_ack_backlog
authorHendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:54:55 +0000 (22:54 +0000)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:57:19 +0000 (23:57 -0700)
Instead of modifying sk->sk_ack_backlog directly, use respective
socket functions.

Signed-off-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net/iucv/af_iucv.c

index 004134b..73ea01b 100644 (file)
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ void iucv_accept_enqueue(struct sock *parent, struct sock *sk)
        list_add_tail(&iucv_sk(sk)->accept_q, &par->accept_q);
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&par->accept_q_lock, flags);
        iucv_sk(sk)->parent = parent;
-       parent->sk_ack_backlog++;
+       sk_acceptq_added(parent);
 }
 
 void iucv_accept_unlink(struct sock *sk)
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ void iucv_accept_unlink(struct sock *sk)
        spin_lock_irqsave(&par->accept_q_lock, flags);
        list_del_init(&iucv_sk(sk)->accept_q);
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&par->accept_q_lock, flags);
-       iucv_sk(sk)->parent->sk_ack_backlog--;
+       sk_acceptq_removed(iucv_sk(sk)->parent);
        iucv_sk(sk)->parent = NULL;
        sock_put(sk);
 }