cpuidle: Menu governor fix wrong usage of measured_us
authorvenkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:21:43 +0000 (19:21 -0700)
committerAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:25:25 +0000 (21:25 +0200)
There is a bug in menu governor where we have
if (data->elapsed_us < data->elapsed_us + measured_us)

with measured_us already having elapsed_us added in tickless case here
unsigned int measured_us =
cpuidle_get_last_residency(dev) + data->elapsed_us;

Also, it should be last_residency, not measured_us, that need to be used to
do comparing and distinguish between expected & non-expected events.

Refactor menu_reflect() to fix these two problems.

Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Gang <gang.wei@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c

index b8f3e21..8d7cf3f 100644 (file)
@@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
 {
        struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
        int last_idx = data->last_state_idx;
-       unsigned int measured_us =
-               cpuidle_get_last_residency(dev) + data->elapsed_us;
+       unsigned int last_idle_us = cpuidle_get_last_residency(dev);
        struct cpuidle_state *target = &dev->states[last_idx];
+       unsigned int measured_us;
 
        /*
         * Ugh, this idle state doesn't support residency measurements, so we
@@ -84,20 +84,27 @@ static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
         * for one full standard timer tick.  However, be aware that this
         * could potentially result in a suboptimal state transition.
         */
-       if (!(target->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID))
-               measured_us = USEC_PER_SEC / HZ;
+       if (unlikely(!(target->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID)))
+               last_idle_us = USEC_PER_SEC / HZ;
 
-       /* Predict time remaining until next break event */
-       if (measured_us + BREAK_FUZZ < data->expected_us - target->exit_latency) {
-               data->predicted_us = max(measured_us, data->last_measured_us);
+       /*
+        * measured_us and elapsed_us are the cumulative idle time, since the
+        * last time we were woken out of idle by an interrupt.
+        */
+       if (data->elapsed_us <= data->elapsed_us + last_idle_us)
+               measured_us = data->elapsed_us + last_idle_us;
+       else
+               measured_us = -1;
+
+       /* Predict time until next break event */
+       data->predicted_us = max(measured_us, data->last_measured_us);
+
+       if (last_idle_us + BREAK_FUZZ <
+           data->expected_us - target->exit_latency) {
                data->last_measured_us = measured_us;
                data->elapsed_us = 0;
        } else {
-               if (data->elapsed_us < data->elapsed_us + measured_us)
-                       data->elapsed_us = measured_us;
-               else
-                       data->elapsed_us = -1;
-               data->predicted_us = max(measured_us, data->last_measured_us);
+               data->elapsed_us = measured_us;
        }
 }