cgroups: fix cgroup_iter_next() bug

We access res->cgroups without the task_lock(), so res->cgroups may be
changed.  it's unreliable, and "if (l == &res->cgroups->tasks)" may be
false forever.

We don't need add any lock for fixing this bug.  we just access to struct
css_set by struct cg_cgroup_link, not by struct task_struct.

Since we hold css_set_lock, struct cg_cgroup_link is reliable.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index d7ab4ff..a391ab3 100644 (file)
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -1808,6 +1808,7 @@ struct task_struct *cgroup_iter_next(struct cgroup *cgrp,
 {
        struct task_struct *res;
        struct list_head *l = it->task;
+       struct cg_cgroup_link *link;
 
        /* If the iterator cg is NULL, we have no tasks */
        if (!it->cg_link)
@@ -1815,7 +1816,8 @@ struct task_struct *cgroup_iter_next(struct cgroup *cgrp,
        res = list_entry(l, struct task_struct, cg_list);
        /* Advance iterator to find next entry */
        l = l->next;
-       if (l == &res->cgroups->tasks) {
+       link = list_entry(it->cg_link, struct cg_cgroup_link, cgrp_link_list);
+       if (l == &link->cg->tasks) {
                /* We reached the end of this task list - move on to
                 * the next cg_cgroup_link */
                cgroup_advance_iter(cgrp, it);