From 26931309a47747fd31b2ef029c29d47794c2d93d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 23:48:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] kill-the-bkl/reiserfs: lock only once on reiserfs_get_block() reiserfs_get_block() is one of these sites where the write lock might be acquired recursively. It's a particular problem because this function is called very often. It's a hot spot which needs to reschedule() periodically while converting direct items to indirect ones because it can take some time. Then if we are applying the write lock release/reacquire pattern on schedule() here, it may not produce the desired effect since we may have locked in more than one depth. The solution is to use reiserfs_write_lock_once() which won't try to reacquire the lock recursively. Then the lock will be *really* released before schedule(). Also, we only release the lock if TIF_NEED_RESCHED is set to not create wasteful numerous contentions. [ Impact: fix a too long holded lock case in reiserfs_get_block() ] Cc: Jeff Mahoney Cc: Chris Mason Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Alexander Beregalov Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker --- fs/reiserfs/inode.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c index cc70b56..6114050 100644 --- a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c @@ -605,6 +605,7 @@ int reiserfs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, __le32 *item; int done; int fs_gen; + int lock_depth; struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th = NULL; /* space reserved in transaction batch: . 3 balancings in direct->indirect conversion @@ -620,11 +621,11 @@ int reiserfs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, loff_t new_offset = (((loff_t) block) << inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits) + 1; - reiserfs_write_lock(inode->i_sb); + lock_depth = reiserfs_write_lock_once(inode->i_sb); version = get_inode_item_key_version(inode); if (!file_capable(inode, block)) { - reiserfs_write_unlock(inode->i_sb); + reiserfs_write_unlock_once(inode->i_sb, lock_depth); return -EFBIG; } @@ -636,7 +637,7 @@ int reiserfs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, /* find number of block-th logical block of the file */ ret = _get_block_create_0(inode, block, bh_result, create | GET_BLOCK_READ_DIRECT); - reiserfs_write_unlock(inode->i_sb); + reiserfs_write_unlock_once(inode->i_sb, lock_depth); return ret; } /* @@ -754,7 +755,7 @@ int reiserfs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, if (!dangle && th) retval = reiserfs_end_persistent_transaction(th); - reiserfs_write_unlock(inode->i_sb); + reiserfs_write_unlock_once(inode->i_sb, lock_depth); /* the item was found, so new blocks were not added to the file ** there is no need to make sure the inode is updated with this @@ -1005,9 +1006,11 @@ int reiserfs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, * long time. reschedule if needed and also release the write * lock for others. */ - reiserfs_write_unlock(inode->i_sb); - cond_resched(); - reiserfs_write_lock(inode->i_sb); + if (need_resched()) { + reiserfs_write_unlock_once(inode->i_sb, lock_depth); + schedule(); + lock_depth = reiserfs_write_lock_once(inode->i_sb); + } retval = search_for_position_by_key(inode->i_sb, &key, &path); if (retval == IO_ERROR) { @@ -1042,7 +1045,7 @@ int reiserfs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, retval = err; } - reiserfs_write_unlock(inode->i_sb); + reiserfs_write_unlock_once(inode->i_sb, lock_depth); reiserfs_check_path(&path); return retval; } -- 1.8.2.3