Btrfs: use RB_ROOT to intialize rb_trees instead of setting rb_node to NULL
authorEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:43:04 +0000 (19:43 +0000)
committerChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 21:26:50 +0000 (16:26 -0500)
commit6bef4d317193d3badbbfa3f3c593758ace84a629
tree8aa9fcf3297c69033b9a9a83a27ecccaab0f9d7d
parent3f6fae9559225741c91f1320090b285da1413290
Btrfs: use RB_ROOT to intialize rb_trees instead of setting rb_node to NULL

btrfs inialize rb trees in quite a number of places by settin rb_node =
NULL;  The problem with this is that 17d9ddc72fb8bba0d4f678 in the
linux-next tree adds a new field to that struct which needs to be NULL for
the new rbtree library code to work properly.  This patch uses RB_ROOT as
the intializer so all of the relevant fields will be NULL'd.  Without the
patch I get a panic.

Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
fs/btrfs/ref-cache.h
fs/btrfs/relocation.c
fs/btrfs/transaction.c