x25: bit and/or confusion in x25_ioctl()?
authorroel kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:59:42 +0000 (00:59 +0000)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:44:07 +0000 (03:44 -0700)
commit06a96b33aea838b61a6eeccded781a305cf85a12
tree0779090d15ab5827bede0ffcbfb6b817fd784ed7
parentf14d42f314cb45a080bf84ecadf8b9b1eebbe9fd
x25: bit and/or confusion in x25_ioctl()?

Looking at commit ebc3f64b864f it appears that this was intended
and not the original, equivalent to `if (facilities.reverse & ~0x81)'.

In x25_parse_facilities() that patch changed how facilities->reverse
was set. No other bits were set than 0x80 and/or 0x01.

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net/x25/af_x25.c