From 95eacd27e2a0924f1435654c06712cee6be099ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:27:42 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [TCP]: fix comments that got messed up during code move MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 4b27739..904289d 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -1467,8 +1467,9 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_ return flag; } -/* F-RTO can only be used if TCP has never retransmitted anything other than - * head (SACK enhanced variant from Appendix B of RFC4138 is more robust here) +/* If we receive more dupacks than we expected counting segments + * in assumption of absent reordering, interpret this as reordering. + * The only another reason could be bug in receiver TCP. */ static void tcp_check_reno_reordering(struct sock *sk, const int addend) { @@ -1516,6 +1517,9 @@ static inline void tcp_reset_reno_sack(struct tcp_sock *tp) tp->sacked_out = 0; } +/* F-RTO can only be used if TCP has never retransmitted anything other than + * head (SACK enhanced variant from Appendix B of RFC4138 is more robust here) + */ int tcp_use_frto(struct sock *sk) { const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); -- 1.8.2.3