From 00ae36de49cc718d4122e1c8aac96fd1a5a2553c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anton Blanchard Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:17:16 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Better check in show_instructions Instead of just checking that an address is in the right range, use the provided __kernel_text_address() helper which covers both the kernel and module text sections. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras --- arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c index 7b2f645..f3d4dd5 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c @@ -341,13 +341,6 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, static int instructions_to_print = 16; -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 -#define BAD_PC(pc) ((REGION_ID(pc) != KERNEL_REGION_ID) && \ - (REGION_ID(pc) != VMALLOC_REGION_ID)) -#else -#define BAD_PC(pc) ((pc) < KERNELBASE) -#endif - static void show_instructions(struct pt_regs *regs) { int i; @@ -366,7 +359,8 @@ static void show_instructions(struct pt_regs *regs) * bad address because the pc *should* only be a * kernel address. */ - if (BAD_PC(pc) || __get_user(instr, (unsigned int __user *)pc)) { + if (!__kernel_text_address(pc) || + __get_user(instr, (unsigned int __user *)pc)) { printk("XXXXXXXX "); } else { if (regs->nip == pc) -- 1.8.2.3