From: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 23:06:36 +0000 (-0800)
Subject: ACPI: use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk in acpi_processor_hotplug_notify()
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.25-rc6~19^2~2^3~2
X-Git-Url: http://ftp.safe.ca/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d6f882e10442c1ea6ed5f93365f48be4cb520be7;p=safe%2Fjmp%2Flinux-2.6

ACPI: use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk in acpi_processor_hotplug_notify()

For consistency, use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk in
acpi_processor_hotplug_notify() for BUS_CHECK and DEVICE_CHECK events

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
index a3cc8a9..3501cb5 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -897,9 +897,10 @@ acpi_processor_hotplug_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
 	switch (event) {
 	case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
 	case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
-		printk("Processor driver received %s event\n",
+		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
+		"Processor driver received %s event\n",
 		       (event == ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK) ?
-		       "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK");
+		       "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK"));
 
 		if (!is_processor_present(handle))
 			break;