From: Andrew Morton Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:26:43 +0000 (-0700) Subject: [PATCH] x86: do_IRQ(): check irq number X-Git-Tag: v2.6.18-rc1~455 X-Git-Url: http://ftp.safe.ca/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a052b68b1e7a31f1e6a721290035e9deb0f6fed9;p=safe%2Fjmp%2Flinux-2.6 [PATCH] x86: do_IRQ(): check irq number We recently changed x86 to handle more than 256 IRQs. Add a check in do_IRQ() just to make sure that nothing went wrong with that implementation. [chrisw@sous-sol.org: do x86_64 too] Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Rusty Russell Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Chris Wright Cc: "Protasevich, Natalie" Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c b/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c index c703bc7..9eec943 100644 --- a/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c @@ -60,6 +60,12 @@ fastcall unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs) u32 *isp; #endif + if (unlikely((unsigned)irq >= NR_IRQS)) { + printk(KERN_EMERG "%s: cannot handle IRQ %d\n", + __FUNCTION__, irq); + BUG(); + } + irq_enter(); #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW /* Debugging check for stack overflow: is there less than 1KB free? */ diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c index 3be0a7e..bfa82f5 100644 --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c @@ -118,6 +118,12 @@ asmlinkage unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs) /* high bit used in ret_from_ code */ unsigned irq = ~regs->orig_rax; + if (unlikely(irq >= NR_IRQS)) { + printk(KERN_EMERG "%s: cannot handle IRQ %d\n", + __FUNCTION__, irq); + BUG(); + } + exit_idle(); irq_enter(); #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW