kill-the-bkl/reiserfs: acquire the inode mutex safely

While searching a pathname, an inode mutex can be acquired
in do_lookup() which calls reiserfs_lookup() which in turn
acquires the write lock.

On the other side reiserfs_fill_super() can acquire the write_lock
and then call reiserfs_lookup_privroot() which can acquire an
inode mutex (the root of the mount point).

So we theoretically risk an AB - BA lock inversion that could lead
to a deadlock.

As for other lock dependencies found since the bkl to mutex
conversion, the fix is to use reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe() which
drops the lock dependency to the write lock.

[ Impact: fix a possible deadlock with reiserfs ]

Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
index e9a972b..d23d6d7 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
@@ -537,40 +537,6 @@ static inline void insert_journal_hash(struct reiserfs_journal_cnode **table,
        journal_hash(table, cn->sb, cn->blocknr) = cn;
 }
 
-/*
- * Several mutexes depend on the write lock.
- * However sometimes we want to relax the write lock while we hold
- * these mutexes, according to the release/reacquire on schedule()
- * properties of the Bkl that were used.
- * Reiserfs performances and locking were based on this scheme.
- * Now that the write lock is a mutex and not the bkl anymore, doing so
- * may result in a deadlock:
- *
- * A acquire write_lock
- * A acquire j_commit_mutex
- * A release write_lock and wait for something
- * B acquire write_lock
- * B can't acquire j_commit_mutex and sleep
- * A can't acquire write lock anymore
- * deadlock
- *
- * What we do here is avoiding such deadlock by playing the same game
- * than the Bkl: if we can't acquire a mutex that depends on the write lock,
- * we release the write lock, wait a bit and then retry.
- *
- * The mutexes concerned by this hack are:
- * - The commit mutex of a journal list
- * - The flush mutex
- * - The journal lock
- */
-static inline void reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe(struct mutex *m,
-                              struct super_block *s)
-{
-       reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
-       mutex_lock(m);
-       reiserfs_write_lock(s);
-}
-
 /* lock the current transaction */
 static inline void lock_journal(struct super_block *sb)
 {

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c b/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
index 6925b83..59870a4 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
@@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ int reiserfs_lookup_privroot(struct super_block *s)
        int err = 0;
 
        /* If we don't have the privroot located yet - go find it */
-       mutex_lock(&s->s_root->d_inode->i_mutex);
+       reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe(&s->s_root->d_inode->i_mutex, s);
        dentry = lookup_one_len(PRIVROOT_NAME, s->s_root,
                                strlen(PRIVROOT_NAME));
        if (!IS_ERR(dentry)) {
@@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ int reiserfs_xattr_init(struct super_block *s, int mount_flags)
 
        if (privroot->d_inode) {
                s->s_xattr = reiserfs_xattr_handlers;
-               mutex_lock(&privroot->d_inode->i_mutex);
+               reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe(&privroot->d_inode->i_mutex, s);
                if (!REISERFS_SB(s)->xattr_root) {
                        struct dentry *dentry;
                        dentry = lookup_one_len(XAROOT_NAME, privroot,

diff --git a/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h b/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
index 508fb52..a498d92 100644 (file)
--- a/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
@@ -63,6 +63,41 @@ int reiserfs_write_lock_once(struct super_block *s);
 void reiserfs_write_unlock_once(struct super_block *s, int lock_depth);
 
 /*
+ * Several mutexes depend on the write lock.
+ * However sometimes we want to relax the write lock while we hold
+ * these mutexes, according to the release/reacquire on schedule()
+ * properties of the Bkl that were used.
+ * Reiserfs performances and locking were based on this scheme.
+ * Now that the write lock is a mutex and not the bkl anymore, doing so
+ * may result in a deadlock:
+ *
+ * A acquire write_lock
+ * A acquire j_commit_mutex
+ * A release write_lock and wait for something
+ * B acquire write_lock
+ * B can't acquire j_commit_mutex and sleep
+ * A can't acquire write lock anymore
+ * deadlock
+ *
+ * What we do here is avoiding such deadlock by playing the same game
+ * than the Bkl: if we can't acquire a mutex that depends on the write lock,
+ * we release the write lock, wait a bit and then retry.
+ *
+ * The mutexes concerned by this hack are:
+ * - The commit mutex of a journal list
+ * - The flush mutex
+ * - The journal lock
+ * - The inode mutex
+ */
+static inline void reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe(struct mutex *m,
+                              struct super_block *s)
+{
+       reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
+       mutex_lock(m);
+       reiserfs_write_lock(s);
+}
+
+/*
  * When we schedule, we usually want to also release the write lock,
  * according to the previous bkl based locking scheme of reiserfs.
  */