[ARM] pxa: build pwm.c according to HAVE_PWM instead of PXA_PWM

The PXA_PWM config option is really redundant since the introduction
of HAVE_PWM, replace that with HAVE_PWM to avoid confusion.

Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/Kconfig
index 17d3fbd..47747f9 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/Kconfig
@@ -505,12 +505,6 @@ config PXA_SSP
        help
          Enable support for PXA2xx SSP ports
 
-config PXA_PWM
-       tristate
-       default BACKLIGHT_PWM
-       help
-         Enable support for PXA2xx/PXA3xx PWM controllers
-
 config TOSA_BT
        tristate "Control the state of built-in bluetooth chip on Sharp SL-6000"
        depends on MACH_TOSA

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/Makefile
index 682dbf4..4bcebf7 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/Makefile
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ endif
 
 # Generic drivers that other drivers may depend upon
 obj-$(CONFIG_PXA_SSP)          += ssp.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_PXA_PWM)          += pwm.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_PWM)         += pwm.o
 
 # SoC-specific code
 obj-$(CONFIG_PXA25x)           += mfp-pxa2xx.o pxa2xx.o pxa25x.o