libata: be less verbose about hpa
authorTejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:45:54 +0000 (20:45 +0900)
committerJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 06:44:19 +0000 (02:44 -0400)
There's no reason to print out hpa related messages when HPA is not
active.  Kill the unconditional message and add a warning message
which is printed if HPA size is smaller than the current size.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
drivers/ata/libata-core.c

index adfae9d..deda684 100644 (file)
@@ -983,11 +983,6 @@ static u64 ata_hpa_resize(struct ata_device *dev)
        else
                hpa_sectors = ata_read_native_max_address(dev);
 
-       /* if no hpa, both should be equal */
-       ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_INFO, "%s 1: sectors = %lld, "
-                               "hpa_sectors = %lld\n",
-               __FUNCTION__, (long long)sectors, (long long)hpa_sectors);
-
        if (hpa_sectors > sectors) {
                ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_INFO,
                        "Host Protected Area detected:\n"
@@ -1009,7 +1004,11 @@ static u64 ata_hpa_resize(struct ata_device *dev)
                                return hpa_sectors;
                        }
                }
-       }
+       } else if (hpa_sectors < sectors)
+               ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, "%s 1: hpa sectors (%lld) "
+                              "is smaller than sectors (%lld)\n", __FUNCTION__,
+                              (long long)hpa_sectors, (long long)sectors);
+
        return sectors;
 }