Addresses the regression noted in
http://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134
Also mark a couple of other regressions as requiring fixing.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
struct nfs_fh lastfh;
struct qstr name;
int ret;
struct nfs_fh lastfh;
struct qstr name;
int ret;
- //int referral_count = 0;
dprintk("--> nfs4_path_walk(,,%s)\n", path);
fsinfo.fattr = &fattr;
nfs_fattr_init(&fattr);
dprintk("--> nfs4_path_walk(,,%s)\n", path);
fsinfo.fattr = &fattr;
nfs_fattr_init(&fattr);
- if (*path++ != '/') {
- dprintk("nfs4_get_root: Path does not begin with a slash\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ /* Eat leading slashes */
+ while (*path == '/')
+ path++;
/* Start by getting the root filehandle from the server */
ret = server->nfs_client->rpc_ops->getroot(server, mntfh, &fsinfo);
/* Start by getting the root filehandle from the server */
ret = server->nfs_client->rpc_ops->getroot(server, mntfh, &fsinfo);
+ /* FIXME: It is quite valid for the server to return a referral here */
if (fattr.valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_V4_REFERRAL) {
printk(KERN_ERR "nfs4_get_root:"
" getroot obtained referral\n");
if (fattr.valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_V4_REFERRAL) {
printk(KERN_ERR "nfs4_get_root:"
" getroot obtained referral\n");
+ /* FIXME: Why shouldn't the user be able to use ".." in the path? */
if (path[0] == '.' && path[1] == '.' && (path[2] == '/' || !path[2])
) {
printk(KERN_ERR "nfs4_get_root:"
if (path[0] == '.' && path[1] == '.' && (path[2] == '/' || !path[2])
) {
printk(KERN_ERR "nfs4_get_root:"
+ /* FIXME: Referrals are quite valid here too */
if (fattr.valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_V4_REFERRAL) {
printk(KERN_ERR "nfs4_get_root:"
" lookupfh obtained referral\n");
if (fattr.valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_V4_REFERRAL) {
printk(KERN_ERR "nfs4_get_root:"
" lookupfh obtained referral\n");