[RTNETLINK]: Fix typo causing wrong skb to be freed
[safe/jmp/linux-2.6] / net / core / filter.c
index 3a10e0b..5b4486a 100644 (file)
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
  * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
  *
  * Andi Kleen - Fix a few bad bugs and races.
+ * Kris Katterjohn - Added many additional checks in sk_chk_filter()
  */
 
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -33,6 +34,7 @@
 #include <linux/timer.h>
 #include <asm/system.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>
 #include <linux/filter.h>
 
 /* No hurry in this branch */
@@ -63,7 +65,7 @@ static inline void *load_pointer(struct sk_buff *skb, int k,
 }
 
 /**
- *     sk_run_filter   -       run a filter on a socket
+ *     sk_run_filter - run a filter on a socket
  *     @skb: buffer to run the filter on
  *     @filter: filter to apply
  *     @flen: length of filter
@@ -73,13 +75,12 @@ static inline void *load_pointer(struct sk_buff *skb, int k,
  * filtering, filter is the array of filter instructions, and
  * len is the number of filter blocks in the array.
  */
-int sk_run_filter(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock_filter *filter, int flen)
+unsigned int sk_run_filter(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock_filter *filter, int flen)
 {
        struct sock_filter *fentry;     /* We walk down these */
        void *ptr;
-       u32 A = 0;                      /* Accumulator */
-       u32 X = 0;                      /* Index Register */
+       u32 A = 0;                      /* Accumulator */
+       u32 X = 0;                      /* Index Register */
        u32 mem[BPF_MEMWORDS];          /* Scratch Memory Store */
        u32 tmp;
        int k;
@@ -174,19 +175,19 @@ int sk_run_filter(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock_filter *filter, int flen)
                        continue;
                case BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS:
                        k = fentry->k;
- load_w:
+load_w:
                        ptr = load_pointer(skb, k, 4, &tmp);
                        if (ptr != NULL) {
-                               A = ntohl(*(u32 *)ptr);
+                               A = ntohl(get_unaligned((u32 *)ptr));
                                continue;
                        }
                        break;
                case BPF_LD|BPF_H|BPF_ABS:
                        k = fentry->k;
- load_h:
+load_h:
                        ptr = load_pointer(skb, k, 2, &tmp);
                        if (ptr != NULL) {
-                               A = ntohs(*(u16 *)ptr);
+                               A = ntohs(get_unaligned((u16 *)ptr));
                                continue;
                        }
                        break;
@@ -240,9 +241,9 @@ load_b:
                        A = X;
                        continue;
                case BPF_RET|BPF_K:
-                       return ((unsigned int)fentry->k);
+                       return fentry->k;
                case BPF_RET|BPF_A:
-                       return ((unsigned int)A);
+                       return A;
                case BPF_ST:
                        mem[fentry->k] = A;
                        continue;
@@ -250,7 +251,7 @@ load_b:
                        mem[fentry->k] = X;
                        continue;
                default:
-                       /* Invalid instruction counts as RET */
+                       WARN_ON(1);
                        return 0;
                }
 
@@ -283,10 +284,12 @@ load_b:
  *
  * Check the user's filter code. If we let some ugly
  * filter code slip through kaboom! The filter must contain
- * no references or jumps that are out of range, no illegal instructions
- * and no backward jumps. It must end with a RET instruction
+ * no references or jumps that are out of range, no illegal
+ * instructions, and must end with a RET instruction.
  *
- * Returns 0 if the rule set is legal or a negative errno code if not.
+ * All jumps are forward as they are not signed.
+ *
+ * Returns 0 if the rule set is legal or -EINVAL if not.
  */
 int sk_chk_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, int flen)
 {
@@ -298,49 +301,90 @@ int sk_chk_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, int flen)
 
        /* check the filter code now */
        for (pc = 0; pc < flen; pc++) {
-               /* all jumps are forward as they are not signed */
                ftest = &filter[pc];
-               if (BPF_CLASS(ftest->code) == BPF_JMP) {
-                       /* but they mustn't jump off the end */
-                       if (BPF_OP(ftest->code) == BPF_JA) {
-                               /*
-                                * Note, the large ftest->k might cause loops.
-                                * Compare this with conditional jumps below,
-                                * where offsets are limited. --ANK (981016)
-                                */
-                               if (ftest->k >= (unsigned)(flen-pc-1))
-                                       return -EINVAL;
-                       } else {
-                               /* for conditionals both must be safe */
-                               if (pc + ftest->jt +1 >= flen ||
-                                   pc + ftest->jf +1 >= flen)
-                                       return -EINVAL;
-                       }
-               }
 
-               /* check for division by zero   -Kris Katterjohn 2005-10-30 */
-               if (ftest->code == (BPF_ALU|BPF_DIV|BPF_K) && ftest->k == 0)
-                       return -EINVAL;
+               /* Only allow valid instructions */
+               switch (ftest->code) {
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_ADD|BPF_K:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_ADD|BPF_X:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_SUB|BPF_K:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_SUB|BPF_X:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_MUL|BPF_K:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_MUL|BPF_X:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_DIV|BPF_X:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_AND|BPF_K:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_AND|BPF_X:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_OR|BPF_K:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_OR|BPF_X:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_LSH|BPF_K:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_LSH|BPF_X:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_RSH|BPF_K:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_RSH|BPF_X:
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_NEG:
+               case BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS:
+               case BPF_LD|BPF_H|BPF_ABS:
+               case BPF_LD|BPF_B|BPF_ABS:
+               case BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_LEN:
+               case BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_IND:
+               case BPF_LD|BPF_H|BPF_IND:
+               case BPF_LD|BPF_B|BPF_IND:
+               case BPF_LD|BPF_IMM:
+               case BPF_LDX|BPF_W|BPF_LEN:
+               case BPF_LDX|BPF_B|BPF_MSH:
+               case BPF_LDX|BPF_IMM:
+               case BPF_MISC|BPF_TAX:
+               case BPF_MISC|BPF_TXA:
+               case BPF_RET|BPF_K:
+               case BPF_RET|BPF_A:
+                       break;
+
+               /* Some instructions need special checks */
 
-               /* check that memory operations use valid addresses. */
-               if (ftest->k >= BPF_MEMWORDS) {
-                       /* but it might not be a memory operation... */
-                       switch (ftest->code) {
-                       case BPF_ST:    
-                       case BPF_STX:   
-                       case BPF_LD|BPF_MEM:    
-                       case BPF_LDX|BPF_MEM:   
+               case BPF_ALU|BPF_DIV|BPF_K:
+                       /* check for division by zero */
+                       if (ftest->k == 0)
                                return -EINVAL;
-                       }
+                       break;
+
+               case BPF_LD|BPF_MEM:
+               case BPF_LDX|BPF_MEM:
+               case BPF_ST:
+               case BPF_STX:
+                       /* check for invalid memory addresses */
+                       if (ftest->k >= BPF_MEMWORDS)
+                               return -EINVAL;
+                       break;
+
+               case BPF_JMP|BPF_JA:
+                       /*
+                        * Note, the large ftest->k might cause loops.
+                        * Compare this with conditional jumps below,
+                        * where offsets are limited. --ANK (981016)
+                        */
+                       if (ftest->k >= (unsigned)(flen-pc-1))
+                               return -EINVAL;
+                       break;
+
+               case BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K:
+               case BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_X:
+               case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGE|BPF_K:
+               case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGE|BPF_X:
+               case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGT|BPF_K:
+               case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGT|BPF_X:
+               case BPF_JMP|BPF_JSET|BPF_K:
+               case BPF_JMP|BPF_JSET|BPF_X:
+                       /* for conditionals both must be safe */
+                       if (pc + ftest->jt + 1 >= flen ||
+                           pc + ftest->jf + 1 >= flen)
+                               return -EINVAL;
+                       break;
+
+               default:
+                       return -EINVAL;
                }
        }
 
-       /*
-        * The program must end with a return. We don't care where they
-        * jumped within the script (its always forwards) but in the end
-        * they _will_ hit this.
-        */
-        return (BPF_CLASS(filter[flen - 1].code) == BPF_RET) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
+       return (BPF_CLASS(filter[flen - 1].code) == BPF_RET) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -360,8 +404,8 @@ int sk_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog, struct sock *sk)
        int err;
 
        /* Make sure new filter is there and in the right amounts. */
-        if (fprog->filter == NULL)
-                return -EINVAL;
+       if (fprog->filter == NULL)
+               return -EINVAL;
 
        fp = sock_kmalloc(sk, fsize+sizeof(*fp), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!fp)