Btrfs: Avoid using __GFP_HIGHMEM with slab allocator
[safe/jmp/linux-2.6] / fs / btrfs / async-thread.c
index f2e80f3..c84ca1f 100644 (file)
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
-# include <linux/freezer.h>
+#include <linux/freezer.h>
+#include <linux/ftrace.h>
 #include "async-thread.h"
 
 #define WORK_QUEUED_BIT 0
@@ -142,6 +143,7 @@ static int worker_loop(void *arg)
        struct btrfs_work *work;
        do {
                spin_lock_irq(&worker->lock);
+again_locked:
                while (!list_empty(&worker->pending)) {
                        cur = worker->pending.next;
                        work = list_entry(cur, struct btrfs_work, list);
@@ -164,14 +166,50 @@ static int worker_loop(void *arg)
                        check_idle_worker(worker);
 
                }
-               worker->working = 0;
                if (freezing(current)) {
+                       worker->working = 0;
+                       spin_unlock_irq(&worker->lock);
                        refrigerator();
                } else {
-                       set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
                        spin_unlock_irq(&worker->lock);
-                       if (!kthread_should_stop())
+                       if (!kthread_should_stop()) {
+                               cpu_relax();
+                               /*
+                                * we've dropped the lock, did someone else
+                                * jump_in?
+                                */
+                               smp_mb();
+                               if (!list_empty(&worker->pending))
+                                       continue;
+
+                               /*
+                                * this short schedule allows more work to
+                                * come in without the queue functions
+                                * needing to go through wake_up_process()
+                                *
+                                * worker->working is still 1, so nobody
+                                * is going to try and wake us up
+                                */
+                               schedule_timeout(1);
+                               smp_mb();
+                               if (!list_empty(&worker->pending))
+                                       continue;
+
+                               /* still no more work?, sleep for real */
+                               spin_lock_irq(&worker->lock);
+                               set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+                               if (!list_empty(&worker->pending))
+                                       goto again_locked;
+
+                               /*
+                                * this makes sure we get a wakeup when someone
+                                * adds something new to the queue
+                                */
+                               worker->working = 0;
+                               spin_unlock_irq(&worker->lock);
+
                                schedule();
+                       }
                        __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
                }
        } while (!kthread_should_stop());
@@ -355,8 +393,8 @@ int btrfs_requeue_work(struct btrfs_work *work)
                goto out;
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&worker->lock, flags);
-       atomic_inc(&worker->num_pending);
        list_add_tail(&work->list, &worker->pending);
+       atomic_inc(&worker->num_pending);
 
        /* by definition we're busy, take ourselves off the idle
         * list
@@ -405,9 +443,9 @@ int btrfs_queue_worker(struct btrfs_workers *workers, struct btrfs_work *work)
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&worker->lock, flags);
 
+       list_add_tail(&work->list, &worker->pending);
        atomic_inc(&worker->num_pending);
        check_busy_worker(worker);
-       list_add_tail(&work->list, &worker->pending);
 
        /*
         * avoid calling into wake_up_process if this thread has already