+ * Be careful about ever adding any more callers of this
+ * function. Its flags must be in the namei format, not
+ * what get passed to sys_open().
+ */
+static int __open_namei_create(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *path,
+ int flag, int mode)
+{
+ int error;
+ struct dentry *dir = nd->path.dentry;
+
+ if (!IS_POSIXACL(dir->d_inode))
+ mode &= ~current->fs->umask;
+ error = vfs_create(dir->d_inode, path->dentry, mode, nd);
+ mutex_unlock(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ dput(nd->path.dentry);
+ nd->path.dentry = path->dentry;
+ if (error)
+ return error;
+ /* Don't check for write permission, don't truncate */
+ return may_open(nd, 0, flag & ~O_TRUNC);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Note that while the flag value (low two bits) for sys_open means:
+ * 00 - read-only
+ * 01 - write-only
+ * 10 - read-write
+ * 11 - special
+ * it is changed into
+ * 00 - no permissions needed
+ * 01 - read-permission
+ * 10 - write-permission
+ * 11 - read-write
+ * for the internal routines (ie open_namei()/follow_link() etc)
+ * This is more logical, and also allows the 00 "no perm needed"
+ * to be used for symlinks (where the permissions are checked
+ * later).