+What: lock_policy_rwsem_* and unlock_policy_rwsem_* will not be
+ exported interface anymore.
+When: 2.6.33
+Why: cpu_policy_rwsem has a new cleaner definition making it local to
+ cpufreq core and contained inside cpufreq.c. Other dependent
+ drivers should not use it in order to safely avoid lockdep issues.
+Who: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: sound-slot/service-* module aliases and related clutters in
+ sound/sound_core.c
+When: August 2010
+Why: OSS sound_core grabs all legacy minors (0-255) of SOUND_MAJOR
+ (14) and requests modules using custom sound-slot/service-*
+ module aliases. The only benefit of doing this is allowing
+ use of custom module aliases which might as well be considered
+ a bug at this point. This preemptive claiming prevents
+ alternative OSS implementations.
+
+ Till the feature is removed, the kernel will be requesting
+ both sound-slot/service-* and the standard char-major-* module
+ aliases and allow turning off the pre-claiming selectively via
+ CONFIG_SOUND_OSS_CORE_PRECLAIM and soundcore.preclaim_oss
+ kernel parameter.
+
+ After the transition phase is complete, both the custom module
+ aliases and switches to disable it will go away. This removal
+ will also allow making ALSA OSS emulation independent of
+ sound_core. The dependency will be broken then too.
+Who: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: Support for VMware's guest paravirtuliazation technique [VMI] will be
+ dropped.
+When: 2.6.37 or earlier.
+Why: With the recent innovations in CPU hardware acceleration technologies
+ from Intel and AMD, VMware ran a few experiments to compare these
+ techniques to guest paravirtualization technique on VMware's platform.
+ These hardware assisted virtualization techniques have outperformed the
+ performance benefits provided by VMI in most of the workloads. VMware
+ expects that these hardware features will be ubiquitous in a couple of
+ years, as a result, VMware has started a phased retirement of this
+ feature from the hypervisor. We will be removing this feature from the
+ Kernel too. Right now we are targeting 2.6.37 but can retire earlier if
+ technical reasons (read opportunity to remove major chunk of pvops)
+ arise.
+
+ Please note that VMI has always been an optimization and non-VMI kernels
+ still work fine on VMware's platform.
+ Latest versions of VMware's product which support VMI are,
+ Workstation 7.0 and VSphere 4.0 on ESX side, future maintainence
+ releases for these products will continue supporting VMI.
+
+ For more details about VMI retirement take a look at this,
+ http://blogs.vmware.com/guestosguide/2009/09/vmi-retirement.html
+
+Who: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: Support for lcd_switch and display_get in asus-laptop driver
+When: March 2010
+Why: These two features use non-standard interfaces. There are the
+ only features that really need multiple path to guess what's
+ the right method name on a specific laptop.
+
+ Removing them will allow to remove a lot of code an significantly
+ clean the drivers.
+
+ This will affect the backlight code which won't be able to know
+ if the backlight is on or off. The platform display file will also be
+ write only (like the one in eeepc-laptop).
+
+ This should'nt affect a lot of user because they usually know
+ when their display is on or off.
+
+Who: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: usbvideo quickcam_messenger driver
+When: 2.6.35
+Files: drivers/media/video/usbvideo/quickcam_messenger.[ch]
+Why: obsolete v4l1 driver replaced by gspca_stv06xx
+Who: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: ov511 v4l1 driver
+When: 2.6.35
+Files: drivers/media/video/ov511.[ch]
+Why: obsolete v4l1 driver replaced by gspca_ov519
+Who: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: w9968cf v4l1 driver
+When: 2.6.35
+Files: drivers/media/video/w9968cf*.[ch]
+Why: obsolete v4l1 driver replaced by gspca_ov519
+Who: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: ovcamchip sensor framework
+When: 2.6.35
+Files: drivers/media/video/ovcamchip/*
+Why: Only used by obsoleted v4l1 drivers
+Who: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: stv680 v4l1 driver
+When: 2.6.35
+Files: drivers/media/video/stv680.[ch]
+Why: obsolete v4l1 driver replaced by gspca_stv0680
+Who: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: zc0301 v4l driver
+When: 2.6.35
+Files: drivers/media/video/zc0301/*
+Why: Duplicate functionality with the gspca_zc3xx driver, zc0301 only
+ supports 2 USB-ID's (because it only supports a limited set of
+ sensors) wich are also supported by the gspca_zc3xx driver
+ (which supports 53 USB-ID's in total)
+Who: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: corgikbd, spitzkbd, tosakbd driver
+When: 2.6.35
+Files: drivers/input/keyboard/{corgi,spitz,tosa}kbd.c
+Why: We now have a generic GPIO based matrix keyboard driver that
+ are fully capable of handling all the keys on these devices.
+ The original drivers manipulate the GPIO registers directly
+ and so are difficult to maintain.
+Who: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: corgi_ssp and corgi_ts driver
+When: 2.6.35
+Files: arch/arm/mach-pxa/corgi_ssp.c, drivers/input/touchscreen/corgi_ts.c
+Why: The corgi touchscreen is now deprecated in favour of the generic
+ ads7846.c driver. The noise reduction technique used in corgi_ts.c,
+ that's to wait till vsync before ADC sampling, is also integrated into
+ ads7846 driver now. Provided that the original driver is not generic
+ and is difficult to maintain, it will be removed later.
+Who: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: capifs
+When: February 2011
+Files: drivers/isdn/capi/capifs.*
+Why: udev fully replaces this special file system that only contains CAPI
+ NCCI TTY device nodes. User space (pppdcapiplugin) works without
+ noticing the difference.
+Who: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: KVM memory aliases support
+When: July 2010
+Why: Memory aliasing support is used for speeding up guest vga access
+ through the vga windows.
+
+ Modern userspace no longer uses this feature, so it's just bitrotted
+ code and can be removed with no impact.
+Who: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: KVM kernel-allocated memory slots
+When: July 2010
+Why: Since 2.6.25, kvm supports user-allocated memory slots, which are
+ much more flexible than kernel-allocated slots. All current userspace
+ supports the newer interface and this code can be removed with no
+ impact.
+Who: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: KVM paravirt mmu host support
+When: January 2011
+Why: The paravirt mmu host support is slower than non-paravirt mmu, both
+ on newer and older hardware. It is already not exposed to the guest,
+ and kept only for live migration purposes.
+Who: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
+
+----------------------------